E-wallet company employees among four charged by ICAC for concealing conflict of interest over application contract

Following a corruption complaint, an ICAC investigation revealed that two employees of an e-wallet company had intentionally concealed their conflicts of interest. The duo allegedly funded and operated a technology service vendor while arranging for their spouses to serve as its directors. They further abused their positions to defraud and induce the company to award a contract for developing an application to the vendor for personal gain. The four individuals were charged today (September 8) by the Commission with conspiracy to defraud.

The four defendants are Lee Chun-yu, 46, then senior business development expert of Alipay Payment Services (HK) Limited (APSHK); Liang Jianen, 44, then senior business development manager of APSHK; as well as Lee’s wife, Leung Ka-lee, 43; and Liang’s wife, Sun Qing, 40.

The defendants face one count of conspiracy to defraud, contrary to the Common Law. They were released on bail, pending their appearance at the Eastern Magistrates’ Courts on Thursday (September 10) for plea.

APSHK, a subsidiary of Ant Group Company Limited (Ant Group), operates the Alipay e-wallet in Hong Kong. Ant Group and APSHK have established clear guidelines prohibiting employees from operating or investing in any technology service vendors with which the companies have business dealings, and require employees to declare any conflicts of interest.

At the material time, Lee and Liang were responsible for developing and managing mini-applications (mini-apps) embedded in AlipayHK. In late 2022, Lee arranged Interomni Plus Limited (IPL) as the technology service vendor for a mini-app “EKBooking”, which facilitated users making appointments and payments with medical institutions for vaccination inoculations and health checks via AlipayHK.

The charge alleges that between November 2022 and June 2025, the four defendants conspired together to defraud APSHK by dishonestly registering Leung and Sun as the sole shareholders and directors of IPL, and causing APSHK to engage IPL as the technology service vendor for the “EKBooking” mini-app.

Lee and Liang are further alleged to have operated or invested in IPL during their employment with APSHK, but failing to seek prior approval from Ant Group or APSHK or to report that Leung and Sun were their respective spouses, and failing to declare the relevant conflict of interest.

The ICAC investigation arose from a corruption complaint. Enquiries revealed the above illicit activities. At the material time, IPL charged medical institutions a commission of approximately 5% to 8% on transactions conducted through “EKBooking”.

Ant Group and APSHK rendered full assistance to the ICAC during its investigation into the case.

The ICAC recommends that private sector organisations formulate clear guidelines and mechanisms for declaring conflicts of interest. Staff members are reminded to avoid conflicts of interest and to make timely declarations to their employers. Employees who conceal any conflicts of interest in relation to their official duties to benefit themselves or their associates may constitute a breach of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance or other criminal laws.

Cover
Image
Court proceeding
Import Data

Following a corruption complaint, an ICAC investigation revealed that two employees of an e-wallet company had intentionally concealed their conflicts of interest. The duo allegedly funded and operated a technology service vendor while arranging for their spouses to serve as its directors. They further abused their positions to defraud and induce the company to award a contract for developing an application to the vendor for personal gain. The four individuals were charged today (September 8) by the Commission with conspiracy to defraud.

The four defendants are Lee Chun-yu, 46, then senior business development expert of Alipay Payment Services (HK) Limited (APSHK); Liang Jianen, 44, then senior business development manager of APSHK; as well as Lee’s wife, Leung Ka-lee, 43; and Liang’s wife, Sun Qing, 40.

The defendants face one count of conspiracy to defraud, contrary to the Common Law. They were released on bail, pending their appearance at the Eastern Magistrates’ Courts on Thursday (September 10) for plea.

APSHK, a subsidiary of Ant Group Company Limited (Ant Group), operates the Alipay e-wallet in Hong Kong. Ant Group and APSHK have established clear guidelines prohibiting employees from operating or investing in any technology service vendors with which the companies have business dealings, and require employees to declare any conflicts of interest.

At the material time, Lee and Liang were responsible for developing and managing mini-applications (mini-apps) embedded in AlipayHK. In late 2022, Lee arranged Interomni Plus Limited (IPL) as the technology service vendor for a mini-app “EKBooking”, which facilitated users making appointments and payments with medical institutions for vaccination inoculations and health checks via AlipayHK.

The charge alleges that between November 2022 and June 2025, the four defendants conspired together to defraud APSHK by dishonestly registering Leung and Sun as the sole shareholders and directors of IPL, and causing APSHK to engage IPL as the technology service vendor for the “EKBooking” mini-app.

Lee and Liang are further alleged to have operated or invested in IPL during their employment with APSHK, but failing to seek prior approval from Ant Group or APSHK or to report that Leung and Sun were their respective spouses, and failing to declare the relevant conflict of interest.

The ICAC investigation arose from a corruption complaint. Enquiries revealed the above illicit activities. At the material time, IPL charged medical institutions a commission of approximately 5% to 8% on transactions conducted through “EKBooking”.

Ant Group and APSHK rendered full assistance to the ICAC during its investigation into the case.

The ICAC recommends that private sector organisations formulate clear guidelines and mechanisms for declaring conflicts of interest. Staff members are reminded to avoid conflicts of interest and to make timely declarations to their employers. Employees who conceal any conflicts of interest in relation to their official duties to benefit themselves or their associates may constitute a breach of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance or other criminal laws.

Industry Tgas

Disclosing Confidential Patent Information

A research and development company protects the intellectual property rights and commercialises its research products through patent applications and seeking collaboration with business partners to turn its invention into practical use.

Cover
Image
Abandoning integrity for personal advantages
Media Feed Source ID
cases_134_cover_en
fade-up
container

A research and development company protects the intellectual property rights and commercialises its research products through patent applications and seeking collaboration with business partners to turn its invention into practical use.

Mr Lee, an officer of the company responsible for handling its patent applications, told Ms Wong, who is a manufacturer of certain equipment, that his company was developing a technology that would significantly reduce the production costs and had yet to file a patent application for the invention.  Ms Wong was highly interested in the new technology.  Instead of going through the standard licensing procedures of the company, she offered advantages to Mr Lee for him to divulge the information related to the technology (e.g. prototype, testing figures, manufacturing workflow).

As the company had not put in place security measures to guard against unauthorised leakage of confidential information, Mr Lee accessed the patent data and passed it to Ms Wong.

Case Analysis

If Mr Lee accepted advantages from Ms Wong, and agreed to divulge sensitive information to the latter, he would contravene Section 9 of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance (POBO).  Ms Wong, who offered the bribe, would also commit an offence under POBO.

Protecting patent information is crucial for safeguarding the rights of inventors and organisations, and maintaining a competitive edge in the market.  To prevent, detect and deter similar malpractices, companies are advised to adopt adequate corruption prevention measures in the relevant process.

All Trades/ Industries
Off
migration_resource_id
cases_151
Show Only in Sector/Industry
False
Sector / Industry Priority display

Offering Advantages in Relation to Funding Application

Tony, an operations manager of a technology consultancy firm, actively promoted his firm’s services to SMEs, offering to manage the entire application process for government technology funding schemes which support SMEs in adopting digital solutions.  He assured his clients that the application would be “hassle‑free” and that his company would arrange the required documentation including vendor quotations for digital solutions.

Cover
Image
Offering Advantages in Relation to Funding Application
fade-up
container

Tony, an operations manager of a technology consultancy firm, actively promoted his firm’s services to SMEs, offering to manage the entire application process for government technology funding schemes which support SMEs in adopting digital solutions.  He assured his clients that the application would be “hassle‑free” and that his company would arrange the required documentation including vendor quotations for digital solutions.

Behind the scenes, Tony colluded with several vendors to submit inflated quotations for digital solutions, such as cloud systems, cybersecurity upgrades and e‑commerce platforms.  Although the funding application guidelines required SMEs to contribute a specified proportion of project costs, Tony secretly arranged for the SMEs’ contribution to be temporarily financed or rebated after approval, thereby creating the false impression of genuine cost‑sharing by the applicants.

To facilitate approval, Tony offered a bribe to a government official responsible for processing applications under the scheme and requested that the vetting process be expedited.  The government official refused the offer and immediately reported the matter to ICAC.

Case Analysis

Case Analysis

Tony may have committed fraud by submitting false quotations to inflate the costs of digital solutions and falsely representing that the applicants had borne the required portion of project costs under the scheme.  Even if the applications were submitted by Tony on behalf of his clients, the SME clients may also incur criminal liability if they knowingly allowed the use of false quotations and supporting documents with the intent of securing approval of the subsidies.

On the other hand, Tony’s attempt to bribe a government official responsible for processing the applications may constitute an offence under Section 4 of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance.  Section 4 prohibits any person from offering an advantage to a public servant as an inducement to or reward for that public servant’s performing or abstaining from performing any act in his or her official capacity.

To prevent, detect and deter similar malpractices, grantors and applicants of funding schemes are advised to adopt adequate corruption prevention measures in their operations.

All Trades/ Industries
Off
migration_resource_id
cases_151
Show Only in Sector/Industry
False
Sector / Industry Priority display

All Industries (Frontline Practitioners) 17/11/2026

Date
Time
10:00 - 11:00 a.m.
Language
All Sector / Industry
On
Course Outline
Corruption prone areas in the business sector
Legal and administrative controls
Handling of conflict of interests
Role of staff in corruption prevention
Zero tolerance toward corruption
ICAC resources and services
Target
Frontline practitioners working in the business sector
Enquiry
2826 3197 (Ms LEE)
Course Full
On
CPD Course
Off
Course Title Industry
Course Title Object

All Industries (Managerial Staff) 10/11/2026

Date
Time
4:00 - 5:30 p.m.
Language
All Sector / Industry
On
Course Outline
Corruption prone areas in the business sector
Legal and administrative controls
Handling of conflict of interests
Tips on managing staff integrity
Integrity management in action
ICAC resources and services
Target
Managerial staff working in the private sector
Enquiry
2826 3197 (Ms Lee)
Course Full
On
CPD Course
Off
Course Title Industry
Course Title Object

All Industries (Managerial Staff) 21/10/2026

Date
Time
10:00 - 11:30 a.m.
Language
All Sector / Industry
On
Course Outline
Corruption prone areas in the business sector
Legal and administrative controls
Handling of conflict of interests
Tips on managing staff integrity
Integrity management in action
ICAC resources and services
Target
Managerial staff working in the private sector
Enquiry
2826 4725 (Ms Lee)
Course Full
On
CPD Course
Off
Course Title Industry
Course Title Object

Unauthorised outside work leading to corruption

A senior engineer of a telephone company, was offered a consultant post for recommending an engineering company’s products to the telephone company.
Cover
Image
Unauthorised outside work leading to corruption
Media Feed Source ID
cases_162_cover_en
fade-up
container

Kenny, a senior engineer of a telephone company, was approached by his friend Philip, an engineering company's proprietor, for assistance in his business in trading communications equipment.

Since Kenny was responsible for overseeing telecommunication network design and procurement of communications equipment, Philip requested him to make recommendations to the telephone company for purchasing the products of Philip’s newly established company.  In return, Philip promised to employ Kenny as a consultant of his company.

Agreeing to the proposal, Kenny then helped in making Philip’s company an authorised vendor of the telephone company and lined up transactions for him.

Case Analysis

An outside employment is an advantage under the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance (POBO).   If Kenny accepted the consultant post for making Philip’s company an authorised vendor of the telephone company, he might be charged of acceptance of bribe.  Philip might also be charged of offering of bribe. Both of them would commit an offence under Section 9 of the POBO.

Besides, there would also be a potential conflict of interest for Kenny to take up the consultant post in Philip’s engineering company even if no bribery was involved.  Kenny should declare his interest by informing his employer in writing of this outside employment.

All Trades/ Industries
Off
migration_resource_id
cases_162

Valuable digital information demands protection

A sales supervisor of a telecommunications company abused his position and accepted HK$80 to HK$100 from a debt collector for each set of client’s personal data retrieved from his company’s database.
Cover
Image
Valuable digital information demands protection
Media Feed Source ID
cases_161_cover_en
fade-up
container

A sales supervisor at a telecommunications company was given easy access to the central database of telephone subscribers.   A friend put him in contact with a debt collector, who offered him HK$80 to HK$100 to retrieve the personal data of each individual telephone subscriber.   The sales supervisor accepted the deal and regularly faxed the requested information to the debt collector.   In 26 months, he received a total of over HK$30,000 through 18 deposits made into his bank account.

Case Analysis

Divulging information to unauthorised parties for personal gain is a criminal act under anti-corruption law.  The sales supervisor had committed Section 9 of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance.  Leaking customers’ personal data is also a breach of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance and can expose the company to damaging lawsuits.

In a case of this kind, a great deal of time was usually required in identifying the suspect during the investigation, because the client database was open to many staff members for reasons of operating efficiency.  If no security measures were in place to control the retrieval of information, innocent staff would be  unhappy to find that they were suspected of the illegal act when investigation was required.  Besides, some staff members like the sales supervisor in this case might consider it a trivial matter to trade client information for some extra cash, especially when the information was so easily accessible.  

Where important data such as customer details, business plans, product designs, etc., are kept in digital formats, this becomes an area that is vulnerable to corruption and related crimes.  Managers must therefore be vigilant in maintaining the security of valuable information. Irrespective of the format in which it is stored, managers should classify information into different security levels according to the degree of sensitivity and confidentiality.   This helps prevent unauthorised access.

It is crucial that managers inform staff clearly of the serious consequences, both for themselves and for the company, that can result from the unauthorised disclosure of company information. The human resources policy of the company should be regularly reviewed and constantly enforced to provide the necessary deterrents against misconduct, e.g. any breach will result in dismissal and report to the relevant law enforcement agencies.

All Trades/ Industries
Off
migration_resource_id
cases_161
Survey Questions
1. In which country or region are you currently located?
Hong Kong
Chinese Mainland
Other (please specify)
2. What type of organisation do you represent?
Listed company
Large private company
SME / start-up
NGO / non-profit
Public organisation
Chamber / trade association
Other (please specify)
3. What is the size of your organisation?
1 - 49 employees
50-99 employees
100 - 199 employees
200 or more employees
4. What is your staff level or position?
Executive / senior management
Middle management
Professional
Supervisory level
Frontline/Technical Staff
Other (please specify)

Thank you for your feedback.